Skip to main content

Activity on Dryden's Essay


(1) Do you find any difference between Aristotle's definition of Tragedy and Dryden's definition of play?
I think there is no difference between both the definition because Aristotle and Dryden both are wrote their definition of Play and Tragedy  On the base of Human nature and Imitation of an action. Merely this both the thing is same.. Emotions of mankind is the center... Whereas pity,fear,delight and instruction.  for better understand it... First Let be clear about both the definition
 
Aristotle's definition of Tragedy
-"A tragedy is the imitation of an action that is serious and also as, having magnitude ,complete in itself... In appropriate and pleasurable language... In Dramatic rather than narrative form, with incident arousing pity and fear, wherewith to accomplish a catharsis of these emotions. "

Dryden's definition of Play.
-" just and lively image of human nature,  representing it's passions and humorous and the change of fortune to which it is subject, for the delight and instruction of mankind. "
According to this Dryden's definition, play is an image of human nature and that the image is just as well as lively ...and According to Aristotle Tragedy is the imitation of an action that is serious and also, as having magnitude, complete in itself. 
Dryden's concept of poetic imitation is not mere slavish copying of nature, poetic representation is not mere imitation for it is the work of poet or creator whose concern is to produce something that is more beautiful than the life...here Dryden focus on the representation that creation should me more beautiful than the life Aristotle also noted this thing in his defination that 'in appropriate and pleasurable language... In dramatic rather than narrative form.

Thus, I found that both the critics trying to explaining same thing by using different metaphors.

(2)  If you are supposed to give your personal prediction, would you be on the side of the Ancient or the modern?  
My personal prediction in favour towards Modern because  As in Essay Eugenius ( Charles Sackville) was in favour of Moderns over the Ancient,  arguing that the modern exceed the ancient because of having learned and profited from their example. 

Coming generation is watching scenario from the shoulder of old generation and that's the way they can watch the far than the ancient. Moderns do not repeat the mistakes which done by ancient... They learn from their and experienced new things. 

(3)Do you think the Argument presented in favour of the French plays and against English plays are appropriate? 
In the essay Lisideius speaks in favour of the French. He agreed with Eugenius that forty years ago... 
In the last generation , the English drama was superior.  Then they have their Jonson, Beaumont and Fletcher but English drama decayed and declined since then. They live in horrible age,  an age of bloodshed and violence and poetry is an art of peace.In the next age, Drama flourished in France and not in England. The French have their Corneille 1606-84 and the English have no dramatist. 
In further discusion he discussed many appropriate point like... 
*Rules of Ancients : the three unities
*english tragic comedy
*plot of tragedies
*matter of character etc., 
By reading all this argument I agree that..Argument presented in favour of the French plays and against English plays are appropriate.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Coleridge's views on Prose,Poem and Poetry.

To Evulate my my assignment click here Assignment  Topic- Coleridge ‘s views on prose,  poem and poetry Name: Khasatiya  Reena K. Roll No.: 36 Enrollment No. : 2069108420180032 Semester : M.A. 1 Year :2017-18 Email Id: khasatiyamili21@gmail.com Submitted to. : Maharaja Krishnkumarsinhji Bhavnagar University Paper No.: 3 literary Theory and Criticism Coleridge ‘s views on prose,  poem and poetry • Introduction The written monument of Coleridge’s critical work is contained in 24 chapters of Biographia literaria (1815–17). In this critical disquisition, Coleridge concerns himself not only with the practice of criticism, but also, with its theory. In his practical approach to criticism, we get the glimpse of Coleridge the poet; whereas in theoretical discussion, Coleridge the philosopher came to the center stage.  In Chapter XIV of Biographia Literaria, Coleridge’s view on nature and function of poetry is discussed in philosophical terms. The poet within Coler

Narrative style in Frankenstein.

• Narrative style in Frankenstein . • Introduction . There are many types of literature that are considered narratives, including novels, dramas, fables, Falk tales, short stories and poetry. Narrative techniques provide deeper meaning for the reader and help the reader in use of imagination to visualize situations. Narrative literary techniques it also known as a literally device. literally elements in narratives include such thing as the setting, plot, theme, style or structure, characters and perspective or voice of story. There are many literary techniques chosen to tell a story. Common techniques relevant  to plot, which is the sequence of events that make up a narrative  include backstory, flash back, flash forward, and foreshadowing. Narrative perspective or who is telling the story, include first person , second person, third person and third person omniscient and it can be recognized simple question that Who tells story to whom? Marry Shelly’s writing style in Fra

Assignment12- A history of Language teaching And English Language Teaching in India

Name:  Reena Khasatiya Sem -3 Mail Id – khasatiyamili21@gmail.com Paper no. 12 English Language Teaching Total words- 1801 Plagiarism- 19% To evalute my assignment Click here Topic- A history of Language teaching And English Language Teaching in India. Introduction In this Assignment I am briefly reviewing the history of Language teaching and English Language Teaching in India. Achievement of  Language is human’s great invention. Language is as necessary as breathing. Language is system which has been considered remarkable platform for communication. History of language teaching include various methods, provides a background for discussion of contemporary methods  and suggests the issues we will refer to in analyzing these  methods. From this historical perspective we are also able to see that the concern that have always been at the center of discussion on how to teach foreign language. Today’s controversies reflect contemporary responses to questions that have been ask