Pariksha pe Charcha

In 2012 Prime Minister’s Genius Adviser Ravsaheb wrote an essay on Pattern of Education on this he wrote that… “We have got examination system, and not education system, let our student must do something worthwhile then always preparing for exams all the time” but, yesterday’s talk of Prime Minister with the students of country far away from above idea. PM interacted with more than 3500 school and college's student from Delhi's Talktora stadium.In this race of run(education) not run for learn or learn for fun but run for first run for top is the only ideology. Exams are like dieses now a days that’s the way we find that students need mental empowerment and from the center of this idea PM held this with student and give many satisfactory solution. He begun his speech with words like, Are you in Tension? It means there something like tensionable and if you are not then you are not in the definition of normal ! Before the talk with PM, there was Minister of Human Resource Prakash Javdekar, who gave introductory speech with the familiar slogans like, Revise and be wise, Smile more and Score more, Choose your style and in last he talk about सर्वशिक्षा अभियान and impact on ‘अच्छी शिक्षा’ this is highly problematic language that there is no need of any metaphor like ‘Good Education’, education itself is a good. There was normally basic Questions Asked by students about Lake of Confidence, Concentration and Focus to the answering them PM gave satisfactory answers with the examples though I am not happy with the answers because I found that Modiji moving from the track and giving personal touch more in comparing it I found an interesting anecdote from Einstein’s life when he was professor, one of his student asked question to him that Sir, again same and an old questions are asked this year! Einstein gave answer that , yes but your answers should present in a new way! It is the sign of enthusiasm in education and it is resulted through learning not from speeches. Besides it there was questions on Mentality of Majority, social pressure on students, In answering them PM come to the point of Yoga and direct connection of Panch Mahabhut with ourselves moreover he said that Make balance with IQ and EQ Here,E means Emotions! When students asked question on career building and about job opportunity reply was that, Watch the Dream of doing something not being something. In this madness of marks students forget the joy in process of learning, everyone tries to come Top but as Jay Vasavda says Instead dream to Topers,Do what you are good at! It seems more likely well that PM talks with the student; shows his concern about all the country’s pupils and that‘s the why he again and again more impacting on language that if possible translate this session in other languages. Instend of giving much respect to national language he praise more Tamil and Kannad as the ancient language of India. Well, celebration of Exam,Pariksha pe Chrcha is the good idea but the real pressure of the student is what will after examination? Degree holders are on road, if making pakoda is the also one way of earning than Is there any importance of degree? The degree which is resulted by giving this hundred kind of exams !

PADMAN movie review

Some people are crazy to chase their wish and constantly hoping for the change which they want. The same kind of story  is movie  Padman have. As  one review says that Padman often seems like a Public Service Advertisement, but  as per my view film have many good cinematography, meaningful lyrics in songs and dialogues, use of camera is also apt and film bring a taboo subject out in the open.


Film upholds the matter of woman’s Menstrual Hygiene. Lakshmi Kant  (Akshy Kumar) saw her wife using ditch cloth while she was in periods this the problem he found and in solution of it whole story goes on.


From the beginning one can easily notice many binaries on screen like Gaytri  feels hesitate to take sanitary pads for the cause of cost but she happily put the money on the name of Dharma. Lakshmi exalted tone towards menstrual hygiene but Gaytri squirming with the idea of his husband. Lakshmi belongs from pure Hindu family while his friend ‘Kasai’ but he  never kills emotions.


 Vandalism of society in name of stature unconsciously upholds the superstitions. It is deeply retrogressive that no one understand Lakshmi’s purpose not even his family, one scene in film that while Gaytri refused to use pad, he try to give it to her sister but she feel very embraced in front of their in-laws. People use word ‘Gandi Bat, Gandi chij’, for pad and menstruation. Even it shows that there is rituals on menstruation, while girl comes on period first time but ladies around her treat how to live in those five days, separate from all household work and all but they didn’t teach or aware about cleanliness during those days and side effect of it may turn into big diesis.

In movie it shows that young boys use word five days ka test match in humours way but in the last speech there is line that if man feel the bleeding only half hour of day , they can feel reality.  it is not an easy task.


Both the chief female characters of film are Gaytri and Pari(sonam), their affinity with the Lakshmi lead him Sharm to Sanmman means Gaytri present her squirm and didn’t support; her rigid ideology toward Dharma put her in unseen cage but, Pari make Lakshmi’s dream true and also open up cages of women, as only free bird can understand value of infinite sky. I found that Sonam’s entry is objectionable portrayal , she is playing tabla in concert it
means her prowess in art, made her character witty in understanding emotions and that’s the way she steer Lakshimkant’s dream.
Climax of movie is when Lakshmi himself tries to wear pad and people saw his blooded trouser. Villagers call him Papi, Dharmbhrsht and even his family leave him but he didn’t quit until he change shameness into respect.  In the last speech by Lakshmi is seems long but quite interesting that Lakshmi didn’t chase for Lakshmi but chase for real change and he done it. Struggle and result both are impressing.Role of Pari's father is also considerable that he played a role of mother and father both for his daughter.

As we all know Movie based on real life story of Tamilnadu’s social activist Arunachalam Murugananthan. It is not an easy task to talk about taboo in real life though it is worthy that He struggle a lot and  inventing low cost pad making machines, But still unfortunately it shameful in country that basic need of women is not provided to everyone . Swatch and Swastha is still slogan on banner. Some are trying to do that but many are still happy in as it is. It is certain that one movie can not break society’s binaries but we should try to understand that stereotypes consume our being.
 

Theory of Deconstruction

* Here is my answer of thinking activity on Deconstruction and Derrida.
http://dilipbarad.blogspot.in/2015/03/deconstruction-and-derrida.html

1.What I understand by Deconstruction.
Srtucturalist Literary Criticism argues that the Novelty value of literary text can lie only in new structure, and post structuralist tries to open up that hidden meanings, so one can say that Literature is written as disguise. 

Term Aporia also means that, What text says and what perhaps it wants to say.

Derrida says that same text cannot be read in the same way. He also talks about free play of meaning that only word can be used for word. It is we who have given the meanings to everything, and  one meaning lead towards the different word, so he says that final meaning is always postponed.

Deconstuction means not breaking or the sake of breaking, it is not destructive activity but an inquiry into the foundations means open up the word and try to get up different meaning from same text. In other words Being skeptic , doubt and ask questions to the text or event is Deconstruction. Thus, Derrida want to transfor the way people think.

Example

Clothes is always interesting subject for humans but there is big controversy between male and female's clothes. Many taboos only for women in clothing. People consider taboo to discuss publicly. It would be weird to say that still many women neither pleased nor displeased with the way the world is headed in this male domination.

Have look at the sign and binary opposition Between eyes in burkha and  eyes in gogals.What is deconstructed here is freedom of clothes in male dominated culture and thinking of women towards women about male dominated society.

Here, Eyes is centre in image, society identifies moral behaviour through it. How people will see? This is the question.